Manage Corporate Citizenship And Sustainability - MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Manage corporate citizenship and sustainability. Answer: Ethics is considered in terms of setting behavioural standards for all courses of life. In order to survive in life, at every moment people have to take decision in terms of choosing the right act. In this assignment, I will discuss how to make ethical decision against ethical dilemma in the context of business management and personal life management. International system ethics of Backwoods Limited will also be discussed in terms of sustainable product innovation. I think that ethical decision-making is priority in terms of keeping control over situations. In terms setting ethical behaviour, it is necessary to consider three ethical theories from different categories - Normative ethics, Meta ethics, Applied ethics. I would like to discuss these three theories in the context of my personal ethical framework. Based on this discussion I will justify how I take decision in managing ethical problem. According to me, human beings are the moral agents. Our behaviour needs to reflect humanity. We all have some of the responsibilities towards society. Similarly, businesses also have to execute some of the responsibilities towards global society. Accomplishing welfare of society is considered one of the premium needs of business ethics and personal ethics. We, individuals need to engage ourselves to be a part of a global system of ethics, which is sustainable. As per my vision, business entrepreneurs are the social leaders. They are able to set a new trend in terms of designing a sustainable global society. In this context, social entrepreneurs need to think from the aspect of technology and sustainability in order to take right decision. Giving priority to ethics is necessary to develop personality in terms of influencing people. Ethical behaviour leads us to take the right attitudes in terms of fulfilling our personal intention. On the other hand, in terms of sustaining in the comp etitive environment, we need to behave logically. Hence, I think that ethical behaviour is a rational system in terms of driving globalization in the right order. I also think that in order to survive in a globalised environment, cross culture is necessary to take into account. In order to be a part of cross culture, we need to give priority to the advancement of technology. Today, without considering technology we cannot be able to take the right decision in terms initiating a sustainable system. Ethics is considered as the standard of behaviour in terms of taking decision at all levels of life. The purpose of ethical framework is to develop our society as a lot more ethical (Platt, Kass McGraw, 2014). Ethics need to be concern of every individual to behave in the proper way towards making choices on daily basis. On the other hand, the concern of ethics makes an organization responsible in terms of fulfilling the needs of society (Platt, Kass McGraw, 2014). In the case of businesses, system choices are priority in accomplishing business mission, vision and objectives. System choices are also priority to consider technological advancement in initiating sustainable business innovation. As an example, we can take into account the bottles of Blackwoods Beverages from 1965 (Bond, 2015). These bottles are considered as the novelty of Blackwoods Limited due to its durability. Blackwoods Limited declared that the bottles of Blackwood beverages were their property. People were stric tly prosecuted to use, destroy and retain the bottles. The company enforced property rights over the Blackwoods beverage bottles in terms of showing how social and cultural value can switch over time. On the other hand, enforcing this property rights managementthe efficiency of resource use in global society. If anyone failed in returning one of the Blackwoods bottles, the person could be arrested. However, in a time range within 1920 to 1965 some of the people reserved the bottles (Denton, 2014). It is necessary to note hereby that the price of those bottles is $15 now (Ford Richardson, 2013). This system ethics helps Blackwoods Limited to control unnecessary waste of the containers and excess packaging (Crossan, Mazutis Seijts, 2013). The system choices of the company are cost effective also. Blackwoods Limited gave value packaging more than the contents in it (Thiel et al., 2012). It enables the company to develop a strong brand value and identity in global society. In addition, the choice of this system ethics made a change in the design of our global society. It leaded our society to learn how should be the process of resource allocation in terms of restricting unnecessary wastes. This company is a good example to see how values are changed in the same social and cultural system with the continuous development of technology. From this example, it is understood that the system choice is the priority in order to solve poor design of society. The bottles of Blackwoods beverages are now considered as the antiques property (Iphofen, 2016). It is necessary to mention hereby that the Blackwoods bottles remain intact over time. I am highly inspired from the choice of system ethics of Blackwoods Limited. It leads me to believe an ethical framework needs to be followed by everyone to make a logical choice on regular basis. Relevance of a global situation is necessary to take into account before taking an ultimate decision. Ensuring sustainability is arguably tough. It is because there is always a conflict between the needs of current generation and future generation (Banathy, 2013). I always ensure to take into account the needs of current generation and future generation in terms of taking decisions. I also take into account three categories of ethical theories in order to take ethical decision for resolving a dilemma. According to normative theory, the parameter of ethical behaviour is norms, standards or criteria (Crane Matten, 2016). Utilitarian theory, Kantian theory and divine command theory are the good examples of normative ethical theory. The welfare of maximum population and social consensus are priority as per normative theory (Rescher, 2014). Meta-Ethics is a unique theory in order to understand the significance of ethics. The concern of Meta-ethics is if ethics is culturally and universally relative (Ford Richardson, 2013). Meta-ethics are considered in terms of judging the nature of ethical claims. Applied theories are important to resolve a specific issue in relation of belonging to an organisation (Brown.edu, 2018). Applied ethics are considered in terms of applying normative theories in terms of making decision within an organisation. Normative ethics help me to decide what is right from wrong. I consider Meta-ethics in terms of judging the nature of an ethical claim. However, I always follow applied theory for reflecting a standard of ethical principles in my behaviour. The important thing for taking the right decision in every situation is accessibility to correct information (Thiel et al., 2012). In this case, my priority is to hook with latest technology. I want to conclude with this claim that it is essential to have a framework for ethical decision-managemen. I think that in order to achieve a sustainable position in the most competitive environment, maintaining a globalised behaviour is important. Social consensus is necessary to take into account in terms of initiating a sustainable design of global system. In order to sustain in this world every day we have to face a variety of situations. In order to tackle these situations, it is my priority to take the most right approach. In this reference, I am completely depended on the latest technology in order to get the instant access of right information. In this way, I determine my mind what I should do against a particular situation. In conclusion, I would like to consider that system choices are the most vital thing in terms of changing unsustainable global society. Reference list Banathy, B. H. (2013). Designing social systems in a changing world. Springer Science Business Media. Bond, T. (2015). Standards and ethics for counselling in action. Sage. Brown.edu. (2018).A Framework for Making Ethical Decisions | Science and Technology Studies.Brown.edu. Retrieved 12 January 2018, from https://www.brown.edu/academics/science-and-technology-studies/framework-making-ethical-decisions Crane, A., Matten, D. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press. Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., Seijts, G. (2013). In search of virtue: The role of virtues, values and character strengths in ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 567-581. Denton, P. (2014). Technology Sustainability. RMB Ford, R. C., Richardson, W. D. (2013). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. In Citation classics from the Journal of Business Ethics (pp. 19-44). Springer Netherlands. Iphofen, R. (2016). Ethical decision making in social research: A practical guide. Springer. Platt, R., Kass, N. E., McGraw, D. (2014). Ethics, regulation, and comparative effectiveness research: time for a change. Jama, 311(15), 1497-1498. Rescher, N. (2014). A System of Pragmatic Idealism, Volume II: The Validity of Values, A Normative Theory of Evaluative Rationality (Vol. 2). Princeton University Press. Thiel, C. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L., Johnson, J. F., Mumford, M. D. (2012). Leader ethical decision-making in organizations: Strategies for sensemaking. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 49-64.